Difference Between Node.js and Django

Node.js vs Django

In Web Application Development, we must have a robust technology to provide strength to our Web application. Node.js and Django both are pretty commanding technologies that help us to create versatile mobile and web applications with an amazing user interface. Since these technologies are open-source without any requirement for a license, many companies and countless developers depend on these. Various big projects are using these technologies and have an enormous web community.

Since both of these technologies are evenly versatile and popular, there is generally, a big question pops up: Which one of these two should we use for our future project? Well, there are numerous methods for an application to work on such technologies. Picking up a technology completely relies on the prerequisite of that specific app.

To answer the above question, let's discuss these two technologies – Node.js and Django; and we will draw a comprehensive comparison between them. This illustration will guide us in picking up the perfect option, keeping in mind the project's needs.

Node.js

Node.js is a non-proprietary and platform-independent runtime environment for implementing JavaScript code outside of a browser. Node.js was developed in 2009 by Ryan Dahl and was designed using JavaScript, C++ and C. It was built on the JavaScript V8 Engine, used in Google Chrome. However, Node.js isn't a framework and not a programming language. We frequently use Node.js for creating backend administrations like APIs for Web or Mobile Applications. It's being used by enormous organizations, for example, Uber, Paypal, Walmart, Netflix, and many more.

A Node.js application runs in a solitary cycle, without making another string for each solicitation. Node.js gives many asynchronous I/O natives in its standard library that forestall JavaScript code from obstructing. By and large, libraries in Node.js are composed utilizing non-impeding ideal models, making hindering conduct the particular case instead of the standard.

Django

Django is a non-proprietary web framework written in Python that allows users to build versatile web applications. Django was developed by Simon Willison and Adrian Holovaty and later maintained by the Django Software Foundation. It was initially released in the year 2005. It follows the MTV (stands for Model Template Views) architectural design. Being a High-level python web framework, it provides a seamless way to structure an application.

Web developers are required to follow the strict formalized scenarios and rules for the implementation of the project. However, it limits creativity, ensuring the code accuracy with fewer errors and bugs in the Output and basic application architecture. There are single or multiple internal apps connected in each Django project, and easy to move these internal apps to a new project.

Comparison between Node.js and Django

CharacteristicNode.jsDjango
Definition Node.js is an open-source, client-side, runtime environment that works on JavaScript for developing web applications.Django is an open-source web framework that works on Python to design web applications.
ArchitectureIt is a runtime environment that works on an event-driven model. It maintains a small stack of requests by running on an Operating System.It follows the MTV (stands for Model Template Views) architectural design and helps in handling data to interact and validate.
PerformanceNode.js performance is quite efficient because it allows the web developers much freedom when it comes to implementation. However, it increases the overall application building time too.The performance of Django is better in comparison to Node.js as it provides the built-in house template that facilitates the fast execution time.
SecurityNode.js comes with less secure core modules. However, some manual operations are required to handle the security flaws.Django is more secure than Node.js that comes along with a built-in system to prevent any security fault.
ComplexityNode.js provides a less complex system. It enables web developers to solve problems single-handedly, as they wanted.Django is much complex, and the web developers have to follow a definite method to solve problems.
Popularity and UtilizationThe Reputation of Node.js is growing progressively in popularity across the globe and might soon become the most chosen framework.Django has a more solid reputation than Node.js as being an older and well-established technology.
EfficiencyNode.js consumes more operating time, but in contrast, it provides an easy to learn the framework and a less cost-effective selection.Django offers faster speed and a more efficient framework. Thus, it is more cost-effective.
CommunityNode.js has a pretty active community with skilled users to guide us on customization and up-dates.Django has a moderately active and comparative small community.
FlexibilityNode.js provides a variety of features and tools due to the huge JavaScript Library. It even allows us to create applications based on JavaScript from scratch.The framework of Django offers limited flexibility. It has strict development requirements with limited tools and features.
Full-stack web development opportunityNode.js is highly appreciated for building both back-end and front-end using only a solitary programming language -JavaScript.In contrast, Django does not provide full-stack web development.

Understanding the Pros and Cons of Node.js

Pros:

  • There is a huge stack of libraries available for Node.js worldwide.
  • Node.js has a huge and very active community.
  • Web Developers of Node.js have open hand for commands execution.
  • Node.js provides less complicated features by following an easier system.

Cons:

  • Node.js provides Asynchronous programming that makes it difficult for many programmers to use.
  • Node.js is single-threaded, which makes it difficult to work properly with intensive applications.
  • Node.js takes much time to develop applications, thus making it less cost-effective.
  • Node.js comes with many security flaws that make the whole system less secure.
  • Node.js has less development speed and low performance.

Understanding the Pros and Cons of Django

Pros:

  • Django is comparatively much easier to learn.
  • Django has a built-in security system, thus provides relatively high security.
  • Django offers a fast application and web development.
  • Django has in-built templates providing a better performance level.

Cons:

  • Django allows developing only single-tiered applications
  • Django doesn’t work properly with small applications.
  • Django needs more attention to understand the framework.

Conclusion

After a detailed analysis, we can say that Django becomes more useful in depicting and accomplishing the essential tasks.

As per the requirements, we can easily create a real-time application using Node.js, and we can rather use Django for handling all the other primary and relatively secure functions, like resetting the password, and many more. This will help a web developer to create a classified web application quickly with the necessary functions.

Well, there is no exact answer to the question, “Which technology is better – Node.js or Django?

Both the technologies, Node.js and Django, are used for development and can be used as per the web developer's specific prerequisites.

There is no thumb rule approach to decide between these two technologies for mobile application and web development. There are specific requirements for each application, and every developer has their preferences. It depends on the selections, whether a developer is using Node.js or may lean towards Django. Just like there can be multiple ways to write a simple program to find a factorial of a number, there are multiple ways to create an application. It is not a good practice to follow a developer since their workflow may differ from our necessities. We need to examine and meet all the technologies' features carefully to satisfy our application development requirements.

Being a professional developer, it is always better to upgrade the skills and improve current knowledge. It is good to learn other techniques and methods while working on one technology to make the system less vulnerable and more flexible.