A

AMC ASAP ASI ATM ADCA API

B

BBA BBC BCA BDO BE BHMS BPO BSC BYE

C

CAA CAB CBI CBSE CC CCC CCTV CDS CEO CGPA CID CMA Computer COVID-19 CPU CRM CRPF CSE CSIR CSR CTC CV CIDR CSS

D

DGP DIY DM DNA DNS DP DRDO DSLR DVD DDR

E

ESI EEPROM

F

FBI FICCI FIFA FIFA FIR FUP

G

GATE GDP GIS GMT GPRS GPS GRE GSLV GST

H

HD HDFC HIV HMM HR HSBC HTML HTTP

I

IAS IBM ICC ICDS ICICI ICMR IDBI IFS IFSC IG IGST IIT IMAO IMF IMPS India INR IPC IPO IPS IRS IS ISC ISD ISIS ISO ITC ITI IUPAC IVF IDC IRL

J

JCB JEE JPEG

K

KFC KGF KYC

L

LAC LCD LLB LOL LPG

M

MBA MBBS MC MCA MRI

N

NABARD NCR NCRT NDA NEET NEFT NTPC

O

OK OP OPD OTG OTT

P

PAN PCOD PCS PDF PH PHD PNG POK PS PUC PWD

R

RIP RSVP RTI RTO

S

SAP SI SMS SOP SOS SP SSC SSD STD

T

TB TBH TCS Teacher TRP

U

UAE UNESCO UNICEF UNO UPI UPS UPSC URL

V

VIP

W

Wi-Fi

X

X- RAY JBL Full form KAS Full Form LPT Full Form in Computer PFP Full Form Programmable Logic Controller(PLC) SWAT FULL FORM TRAI Full Form What is the full form of IMDB? What is the Full Form of WMO Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) FIAT FULL FORM FULL FORM OF IG IN INSTAGRAM FULL FORM OF NTRO Indian National Army(INA) NYKS FULL FORM NDMA Full Form What is DSC's full form? What is the Full Form of EOD? WIPRO Full Form YONO Full Form BFF’s Full Form BRICS Full Form Full form of BSF Full form of CBS Full form of DRS Full form of FAO Full Form of NIA ISP Full Form LTE Full Form NDMA Full Form What is DSC's full form What is the Full Form of EOD WIPRO Full Form YONO Full Form SCSI Full Form Full Form of MEA SJVN full form Full Form of ROM Full form of SBI Full form of SIM Full Form of UNO ICT FULL FORM MICR FULL FORM MRP FULL FORM CISF Full Form Full Form Of BTS ARMY Full form of COBOL FULL FORM OF RADAR What is the Full Form of NSSO What is the Full Form of VPN? What is Full Form of PHC What is the Full Form of GAIL SOS Full Form in WhatsApp DGCA Full Form DSLR FULL FORM ICAO FULL FORM Full form of IMEI Full form of CDN Full form of OTG Bash Full Form CDMA Full Form Full form of CBSSBI Full form of MLA

Full form of DRS

Decision Review System is the full name of this system. In 2008, cricket introduced a technological advancement known as the Decision Review System (DRS). It was created to support umpires in making more accurate, fewer bad calls and upholding the game's fairness. The DRS has altered cricket in several ways since it was first implemented. The DRS system comprises several parts that cooperate to facilitate decision-making. High-resolution cameras, audio sensors, and ball-tracking technology are some essential parts. The ball's trajectory is predicted, and its path is ascertained using ball-tracking technology. This facilitates the analysis of Leg Before Wicket (LBW) decisions and establishes whether or not the ball would have struck the stumps. Any noises produced by the ball, such as soft edges or bat-pad contact, are picked up by the audio sensors and can be very helpful in making decisions. Umpires and third umpires can examine the high-resolution cameras' multiple angles of the action to make accurate decisions after reviewing the footage.

History of DRS

Umpires had to rely on their judgment and the available technology before implementing the DRS. This frequently led to poor decisions, particularly during pivotal moments in a game. This gave rise to numerous disputes and raised doubts about the game's fairness among players and spectators alike.

The DRS was first implemented during a test match between Sri Lanka and India in Colombo in 2008. Very little technology was employed because it was an experimental phase. Nevertheless, it worked well, and the International Cricket Council (ICC) quickly accepted it as an official technology. Its goals were to lessen the amount of incorrect decisions umpires made and guarantee that player skill, not mistake, determines the result of a match. Twenty20 internationals (T20Is), one-day internationals (ODIs), and test matches are among the international cricket matches in which DRS has been used since its inception.

Process of DRS

When a player or captain chooses to challenge an on-field decision because they don't agree with it, the DRS procedure gets started. Depending on the game's format, each team is normally allotted a set number of reviews per inning, usually two or three. The challenging team uses a DRS-specific signal or makes the "T" sign with their hands to indicate that they intend to review. After considering the available video and technological advancements, the third umpire is consulted before relaying the decision back to the on-field umpire.

There are various steps in the review process. To evaluate the validity of the on-field decision, the third umpire closely reviews the available video, which includes replays from various camera angles and ball-tracking data.

Difficulties with the Decision Review Process

  1. The DRS is not without difficulties despite its overall success. Because of the high cost of the technology, smaller countries may find it more difficult to adopt the system.
  2. Since they must interpret the technology's results, qualified and experienced umpires are still required to make the final call.
  3. Furthermore, there have been cases where incomplete accuracy of the technology resulted in incorrect decisions. Discussions regarding the technology's dependability and potential improvements have resulted from this. However, most experts concur that the DRS's advantages greatly exceed its drawbacks.

Advantages of DRS

  1. Since its launch, the DRS has benefited from several factors. The reduction in the number of bad decisions is the main advantage.
  2. As a result, matches now have more accurate results, and players can feel confident that the game is being played fairly.
  3. The DRS has also increased the excitement of the game since it allows teams to contest umpire rulings, giving it an element of surprise and suspense.
  4. Furthermore, the DRS has contributed to eradicating the game's controversy. The umpires can make more informed decisions and make fewer incorrect calls thanks to the use of technology. Because of this, there is now more openness and confidence in the game, which frees players to concentrate on their performance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, introducing technology-assisted decision-making by the Decision Review System (DRS) has greatly changed the game of cricket. It has given players, teams, and spectators a more equitable and precise way to decide on-field disputes. With teams strategically using their review opportunities to challenge bad decisions, DRS has brought an exciting new dimension to the game. Even though DRS has encountered some difficulties and criticism, it is still a crucial component of contemporary cricket and will only get better as technology advances, upholding the integrity and fairness of the game.